Contact

Radiologyauthority.com serves as a reference resource covering diagnostic imaging, interventional radiology, radiation safety, and the regulatory frameworks that govern medical imaging practice in the United States. This page explains how to structure a message to the editorial office, what response timelines are realistic, and what alternative resources exist for clinical, regulatory, or urgent medical questions. Because radiology intersects with patient safety standards set by bodies including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Joint Commission, editorial inquiries touching on regulatory accuracy receive priority review.

What to include in your message

Clear, specific messages receive faster and more accurate responses. Structuring a message around the following framework reduces back-and-forth and helps editorial staff route it to the correct reviewer.

1. Subject area — Identify the imaging modality or topic (e.g., CT radiation dose, MRI safety parameters, contrast agent protocols, interventional procedures such as uterine fibroid embolization or radiofrequency ablation).
2. Specific page or claim — Provide the page title or URL slug where the information appears. Referencing a named section (e.g., the dose comparison table on radiation-dose-medical-imaging) allows editors to locate the relevant passage within minutes rather than hours.
3. Nature of the issue — Distinguish between four categories:
4. Factual correction — A stated figure, agency citation, or technical claim appears to be incorrect. Include the source document or standard that contradicts the published content (e.g., a specific NIST publication, an ACR Practice Parameter, or an NRC regulation at 10 CFR).
5. Missing context — The topic is covered but lacks an important distinction, such as the difference between absorbed dose in grays and effective dose in sieverts under ICRP Publication 103 methodology.
6. Content suggestion — A relevant topic within the site's existing scope is not yet addressed.
7. Technical or accessibility issue — A page fails to load, a table is malformed, or accessibility standards under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act are not met.
8. Supporting documentation — Attach or link to the authoritative source (FDA guidance document, peer-reviewed journal DOI, or named regulatory code) when submitting a factual correction. Unsupported corrections without a traceable public source cannot be acted upon.

Messages that omit the specific page reference and issue category are placed in a lower-priority queue and may wait up to 10 business days for initial triage.

Response expectations

Editorial responses follow a tiered timeline based on issue type and complexity.

Regulatory corrections — particularly those involving radiation safety thresholds, contrast agent warnings tracked by the FDA MedWatch system, or interventional procedure standards from the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) — are escalated to a subject-matter reviewer before any published content is altered. This review step adds 3 to 5 business days to the resolution timeline but ensures that corrections do not introduce secondary inaccuracies.

Content suggestions are batched and reviewed on a quarterly editorial calendar. Suggestions that align with existing topic families — such as imaging preparation guides (see preparing-for-ct-scan, preparing-for-mri) or subspecialty coverage (see neuroradiology-fellowship, breast-imaging-fellowship) — are prioritized over requests that fall outside the site's defined medical imaging scope.

Additional contact options

For inquiries that fall outside the editorial scope of this site, the following named public resources provide direct assistance.

Clinical or diagnostic questions belong with a licensed radiologist or referring physician, not an editorial office. The American College of Radiology (ACR) Find a Radiologist tool and hospital-based radiology departments are the appropriate first contacts. The site page how-to-get-help-for-radiology outlines the pathways for obtaining a second imaging opinion or accessing radiology reports.

Radiation safety incident reporting involving a medical device falls under FDA MedWatch for adverse event submission and the NRC Agreement State program for radiation protection violations.

Imaging billing and coverage disputes are handled by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for federal payers and by individual state insurance commissioners for private plans. The site does not adjudicate or advise on reimbursement matters.

Accessibility complaints related to this site can also be directed to the U.S. Access Board, which enforces Section 508 compliance standards for web content.

How to reach this office

The editorial office for Radiologyauthority.com accepts written correspondence through the site's contact form, which routes messages directly to the editorial queue described in the response expectations table above. No telephone support line is maintained for editorial inquiries; written records are required for all factual correction workflows so that source documentation can be attached and retained.

Messages submitted without using the structured form fields — including the issue category selector and the page reference field — bypass automated routing and enter a general inbox reviewed once per week. Use of the structured form reduces first-response time by an average of 4 business days compared to unstructured submissions.

For time-sensitive regulatory concerns, such as a published radiation dose figure that may conflict with an updated NRC 10 CFR Part 20 limit or an ACR practice parameter revised within the past 12 months, mark the subject line with the label REGULATORY CORRECTION to trigger same-day routing to the senior editorial reviewer.

Privacy Policy

The law belongs to the people. Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 590 U.S. (2020)